[HOT] – Live Briefing: Jeff Sessions Displays Unsteady Recall on Trump-Russia Matters

• Attorney General Jeff Sessions, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, made a selective recall of the contacts of the Trump campaign in Russia

Sessions said that he had "no reason to doubt these women" who accused the man who wants his former seat in the Senate, Roy S. Moore, to seek sexual favors or romantic of them as teenagers.

• Mr. Sessions was asked about his directive that the ministry consider a special advocate to investigate Mr. Trump's political opponents, including Hillary Clinton.

The Run-Up

The podcast that makes sense of the most delusional stretch of the 2016 campaign.

Sessions: I do not do not remember reporting on Russia, but I shot down the Trump-Putin meeting.

Mr. Sessions denied lying in October when he stated that he did not know anyone in the Donald Trump campaign who had had contact with Russians during the presidential campaign. "I do not think it happened," he said.

Court records reveal that Mr. Sessions led a meeting in March 2016 in which George Papadopoulos, a campaign assistant, discussed his relationship with Russia. a meeting between Mr. Trump. and Vladimir V. Putin, the Russian President

"I did not remember this meeting until I saw these reports," said Mr. Sessions

. Sessions testified Tuesday which was still foggy on the details of what Mr Papadopoulos had proposed.

But on one point, he said his memory is clear: he said that he shot down Mr. Papadopoulos' idea of ​​a Trump-Putin meeting. And he said he told Mr. Papadopoulos that he was not allowed to represent the campaign in such discussions.

In summary: Mr. Sessions said he did not remember the Russian influence on the Trump campaign, except Jeff Sessions

By applying the standard sessions on perjury to … Jeff Sessions. , The New York Democrat, has invoked an unexpected and ostensible ally: Senator Jeff Sessions.

He delivered a speech that he said that Mr. Sessions had given the Senate during the proceedings to withdraw President Bill Clinton, Mr. Jeffries said that Mr. Sessions had then justified his vote in favor of dismissal saying that he would not hold the president at a different level than that of a young police officer that he had pursued years ago for lying under oath.

You stated that you refused to hold a president accountable for a different standard than the young police officer you pursued, "said Jeffries. "Let me be clear: the Attorney General of the United States of America should not be held to a different standard than the young policeman whose life you ruined by suing him for perjury."

The sessions disagreed with the comparison, repeatedly calling Mr. Jeffries' suggestion "unfair".

"Mr. Jeffries, no one, no person, not you or anyone else should be prosecuted, not to be charged with perjury for answering the question as I l ​​'. did in this hearing, "said Mr. Sessions. "I've always tried to answer questions accurately and accurately."

A Republican session is divided on government oversight.

While Trump's campaign contacts Russia, it is a recurring theme

The law by which Congress legalized the program of wiretapping without a warrant from the US Bush administration after September 11, Article 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, is expected to expire at the end of 2017 if legislators do so.

The current law allows the government to collect from US Internet companies, without warrants, messages from foreigners abroad that have been targeted for intelligence purposes – even when they are communicating with an American. The leaders of both parties in the House Judiciary Committee have agreed to introduce a bill, called the USA Liberty Act, which would impose new limitations on the monitoring program as a condition for its expansion.

Government agents to obtain a warrant from a judge to consider these messages when the information relates to Americans related to a criminal investigation, but not when it is safe. is a national security investigation. The Trump administration is opposed to this idea

Among others, the representative Ted Poe, Republican of Texas, insisted with Mr. Sessions on this subject. Relying on the wording of the Fourth Amendment's confidentiality rights, he noted that the information contained in the Internet repository had been entered without a warrant, and that querying the database was equivalent to a search. He demanded, "Do not you think the probable cause and a warrant is needed to enter this information?"

Mr. Sessions responded that the Federal Courts "have so held," adding "I am in agreement with the courts, not you, Congressman, on that."

In fact, it is true that several judges have confirmed the use of evidence drawn from the program in cases related to terrorism; the question of whether the resulting evidence can be used in ordinary criminal cases – the type dealt with in the Freedom Act proposal – has not been decided.

Mr. Poe replied, "It is the responsibility of Congress to establish the standard of confidentiality for Americans."

The Constitution supports the idea that the government should obtain a warrant before searching the Internet databases without a warrant. Otherwise, "it's spying on Americans."

Sessions give up fellow Alabamian Roy Moore

M. Sessions told the Judiciary Committee of the House: "I have no reason to doubt these women" who have accused Roy S. Moore of seeking sex or romance with them when they were teenagers.

Moore seeks to fill the seat of the Alabama Senate that Mr. Sessions abandoned when he was confirmed as Attorney General. And Mr. Sessions remains a popular figure in Alabama. The views of the Attorney General matter in his country of origin.

In addition, Republican leaders in Washington are debating whether Mr. Sessions should launch a campaign to claim his place. If that does not happen and Mr. Moore wins in the December 12 special election, it is a question of expelling the Senate jurist and imposing on the governor of Alabama, Kay Ivey, to appoint Mr. Sessions to the Senate.

The two hearings: Russia – and all but Russia.

Mr. The appearance of the Sessions before the Judiciary Committee of the House on Tuesday was really a twofer. There was an audience on the contacts of Trump's campaign with Russia, guided by the committee's democrats who were bored on the subject

Then there was the hearing on any subject other than Russia. orchestrated by the Republicans of the committee, who rushed on the federal law, the growing crime, immigration and Hillary Clinton.

Representative Darrell Issa, Republican of California, summed up Republican sentiment.

I do not speak Russian and I have not met the Russians and I do not really want to talk about it today, "he said, before delving into the questions on the sober houses.

The drug on the marijuana among the "good people"

The democrats were not exclusively concerned by Russia During his time with the general prosecutor, Representative Steve Cohen, Tennessee Democrat, paused to ask Mr. Sessions a topic that had long been associated with him: the pot.

"You once said that good people do not smoke Marijuana, "said Mr. Cohen." Which of these people would you say are not good people? "

Sessions began to be seriously explained, but Mr. Cohen l & #

"Quickly. John Kasich, a good person? George Pataki, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Judge Clarence Thomas – who are not good people? ", He demanded, citing prominent Republicans who, ostensibly, confessed to smoking marijuana

The sessions, laughing with much of the audience room, l? were put in context. "So the question was: what are you doing with the drug use, the epidemic that we see in the country and the way you reverse it? Part of that is a cultural thing.I explained how, when I became the US lawyer in 1981, and that drugs were widely used, over the years, it has become old fashioned, unpopular and the people saw – it was seen as such that good people did not use marijuana. "

And with that, the time allotted for Mr. Cohen's interrogation ended.

The White House has an eye on its performance.

The White House was closely watching Mr. Sessions' performance. The Attorney General has been in hot water with the President since he decided in March to recuse himself from all matters related to Russia, leaving him uncontrolled on special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who investigates Russian efforts to meddle

Representative Robert Goodlatte, the Republican chairman of the committee, seemed to pile up when he said, "Although I understand your decision to challenge you was an effort on your part to do the right thing, I believe that you, as a person of integrity, would have been impartial and just by following the facts wherever they drove. "

Any hiccups in M's testimony Sessions would most likely only aggravate his problems at the White House.

And John Conyers, the highest Democrat on the panel, did not make things easier for the Attorney General when he asked Mr. Sessions if the President had to make "public comments" that could influence an outstanding case ". minimal investigation. "

Mr. Sessions hesitated." He should be very careful about these issues, "he said, before adding a defense of Mr. Trump.

" I would say that it is inappropriate, "said Mr. Sessions." A president can not improperly influence an investigation. And I have not been unduly influenced and I would not be unduly influenced. "

Debate takes place when appointing a second special advocate.

Republicans were pleased that Mr. Sessions arrives with good news.On Monday, the Ministry of Justice informed the committee that senior prosecutors were looking into whether a special adviser should be appointed to investigate the Obama administration's decision to allow a Russian nuclear agency to buy Uranium One, a company that owned a access to uranium in the US The ministry will also examine whether donations to the Clinton Foundation were related to the approval.

Republicans are investigating themselves for the purpose. But Tuesday, Mr. Goodlatte expressed his support, but he repeated that he wanted the ministry to go further and that he appoint a second special adviser. He also urged Mr. Ses to let a special lawyer investigate the Clinton e-mail case.

"There are important concerns that the partisanship of the F.B.I. and the department has weakened everyone's ability to act objectively," he said.

Democrats were outraged by this letter, which they said they did not receive. Mr. Conyers said the appointment of a new special advisor was simply meant to "meet the political needs of the president". He argued that there was not enough evidence to do it. And, he said, it looked like "a banana republic".

Sessions stated that all decisions on investigations would be made "without regard to politics, ideology, or bias."

Rep. Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio, urged Mr. Sessions on a litany of issues that "looks like" They need a special solicitor to investigate, the Attorney General was abrupt: "It seems that" is not enough to appoint a special advocate. "

Sessions is on the hot seat on Russia – again.

Mr. Sessions said twice to the legislators under oath that as foreign policy advisor to Mr. Trump's campaign, he was not communicating with the Russians to support Mr. Trump's candidacy, nor did he know of any other members of the campaign that did it

. His challenge on Tuesday will be to try to reconcile these comments with recent revelations that at least one member of the campaign's foreign policy council, led by Mr. Sessions, and another foreign policy advisor, had informed Mr. Sessions of their discussions with the Russians. at the time.

Mr. Sessions has already had his statements cut once. After telling senators at his confirmation hearing in January that he had had no contact with the Russians, it was revealed that Mr. Sessions had held several meetings with a Russian ambassador during the campaign.

Now, Mr. Sessions must wrestle with comments that he made last month, at another hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. "I did not do it, and I'm not aware of anyone else who did it," Sessions told Senators when he asked him if he believed that the campaigners had communicated with the Russians

Sessions on alert in a letter last week, saying that they would like clarification on "inconsistencies" between these statements and those of the two campaign advisers, George Papadopoulos and Carter Page, who admitted to having contacts with Russians.

"Under oath, knowing in advance that he would be questioned about it, the Attorney General gave answers that, at best, were incomplete," Conyers said. "I hope the Attorney General can clarify this problem in his remarks today."

Let's block advertisements! (Why?)

Thanks for reading Live Briefing: Jeff Sessions Displays Unsteady Recall on Trump-Russia Matters, don’t forget to share this viral news with your friends and family.

>>>>> Source link

Leave a reply "[HOT] – Live Briefing: Jeff Sessions Displays Unsteady Recall on Trump-Russia Matters"